Todos
← Back to Squawk list
ZeroAvia Makes History with Largest Hydrogen-Electric Powered Aircraft
A California manufacturer named ZeroAvia has just paved a significantly bigger path toward the mass use of sustainable aviation fuel with a Dornier 228. (aeroxplorer.com) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Does aviation learn from past mistakes? It has been proven that airframes and hydrogen don't go well together. Anyone remember the Hindenberg?
WTF is with the CONSTANT paywalls on EVERY article I try to read lately???
Yea, a pain. For this one I got around it by hitting <ctrl>P to "print" it to PDF before the paywall splash replaced the content...
Another Social Justice Warrior promoting some Tom fool idea and getting fools to contribute money to his 'cause'. A common career choice these days. Can't blame him for trying, I mean American loves a good confidence swindle.
Note that the company has 1500 orders in it's pipeline, with United Airlines ordering 50 engines to compete in 500 mi service areas. So economics and clean energy seem to be the benefit of this technology.
I like new ideas. Apparently so does the FAA and the customers that ordered 1500 engines.
I like new ideas. Apparently so does the FAA and the customers that ordered 1500 engines.
For real? Aviation is 2.5% of carbon emissions? That is nothing. Most carbon emissions come from China burning coal. In any case, there is no proof that man is contributing to "warming" at all. There are only theories. Other reasons can be subterranean magma, changes in the sun, changes in the orbit of Earth. Stop the madness. Stop the fascist climate alarmism.
The "only theories" argument show a total absolute zero understanding of science. Put simply science collects a whole bunch of facts and them works out a theory that best explain those facts. As more facts become known they either confirm the theory , show where it is invalid and improves it. Also a new theory has to be consistent with existent theories or show why existing theories are wrong.
We now have over thousands of man decades of research in to the climate and how it works. For climate scientists to be wrong now would require overturning just about every theory in science. It is just not rational to think that is in any way probable.
As for other causes such as changes in orbits etc.....they have been evaluated, by numerous groups over many decades, and have found not to fit the facts.
As someone said:" science is the process that stop use believing something that we wish was true but isn't and makes us believe something that is true that we wish it wasn't .
Climate change is clearly fits into the second part of that statement .
We now have over thousands of man decades of research in to the climate and how it works. For climate scientists to be wrong now would require overturning just about every theory in science. It is just not rational to think that is in any way probable.
As for other causes such as changes in orbits etc.....they have been evaluated, by numerous groups over many decades, and have found not to fit the facts.
As someone said:" science is the process that stop use believing something that we wish was true but isn't and makes us believe something that is true that we wish it wasn't .
Climate change is clearly fits into the second part of that statement .
Denying that the climate is warming due to human activity is now as stupid as claiming that the Earth is flat. The evidence is that overwhelming.