Todos
← Back to Squawk list
New England Patriots 767 delivers N95s
A crazy level of red tape for a single flight. Anyone know what kind of avionics upgrade would be needed? I’ve only ever taken my plane to Canada and Mexico... (www.wsj.com) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
While we can search for and probably find the full article elsewhere, it's inconvenient and inconsiderate (or maybe you just didn't realize it, so thoughtless) to post articles hidden behind paywalls.
What I find ironic is the country where this strain of SARS-Cov2 came from, ie COVID-19, is the same country supplying medical gear for the world.
Rapid - there are currently LESS THAN 2,400 people actively carrying the virus in China. (IF the reported numbers by Johns Hopkins are accurate).
What does that have to do with the irony of where it started and who is supplying medical equipment to protect from that which they started.
And to say there are now less than 2,400 people with a virus in a country population size of China...I'd be asking where they got those actual numbers from.
And to say there are now less than 2,400 people with a virus in a country population size of China...I'd be asking where they got those actual numbers from.
OK. I was not questioning the irony that you accurately described. My apologies if that is what you read into my reply.
All I was trying to point out is that, *IF* the numbers reported by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), in collaboration with the World Health Organisation (WHO), are accurate, then China only have <2,400 active cases. *IF* that is the case, then they can afford to supply their excess "medical gear" to those other countries who now require it.
Yes - I do see the irony in this, as you pointed out.
Again - my apologies if I offended you. Maybe I should have just posted my observation as my own comment, instead of replying to yours.
Good day.
All I was trying to point out is that, *IF* the numbers reported by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), in collaboration with the World Health Organisation (WHO), are accurate, then China only have <2,400 active cases. *IF* that is the case, then they can afford to supply their excess "medical gear" to those other countries who now require it.
Yes - I do see the irony in this, as you pointed out.
Again - my apologies if I offended you. Maybe I should have just posted my observation as my own comment, instead of replying to yours.
Good day.
If you trust the PRC to disclose the actual numbers of those who were/are infected and those who died, you are naive. Wuhan, where the virus is reported to have originated, has an estimated population of 11 million people (larger than New York city. Do you think it is reasonable for a universe that size to have such low numbers?
I don't trust ANY numbers coming from there. 2,400 active cases my a$$. And if John Hopkins University posts these findings, I agree that they too, are naive..very naive.
This article raises severe doubts about the honesty of China/WHO reporting: https://www.france24.com/en/20200331-stacks-of-urns-in-wuhan-raise-doubts-about-china-s-official-virus-toll