Todos
← Back to Squawk list
US House Bill Threatens to Slash Airline Bag Fees to $4.50
Rep. John Mica wants to go down in history as the airline bag fee slasher. (www.msn.com) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Sneaky John is at it again. I use to live in his district. Guess he figures he can win over the passenger while privatizing ATC. Headline sounds good but . . . .
which of course would jump ticket prices to compensate there by doing nothing.
How short sighed many of you are and how quickly you forget. You fail to know your social political history. It's only been 9 years that airline bag fees have been the norm. Before then the fees were charged primarily for bags over 50 pounds. Airlines began charging fees as the standard to counter the impact of the 2008 recession and to help offset the increase in fuel prices. The fee was only supposed to be temporary. The fuel prices stabilized and even came down and the recession ended, but the airlines oddly forgot to end the baggage fees. Maybe it was because they realized they were making millions more because of the no longer necessary fees.
The airline industry while private has always been heavily regulated. The idea of planes falling out of the sky, midair and other collisions, and other safety related incidents including the great possibility of hijackings and terrorism require that the industry be highly regulated to ensure the safety of the flying and non-flying public. In addition, regulations ensure consistent, adequate, proficient training, skills, procedures and policies not just locally, but worldwide. The fees sting because the airlines lied to the flying public. And now a few companies have taken the charging of fees to a level of ridiculousness. And that is why congress is now considering increasing regulations. When the cats away the mice will play. If the airlines insist on being irresponsible and greedy then they only have themselves to blame for increased government intervention.
The airline industry while private has always been heavily regulated. The idea of planes falling out of the sky, midair and other collisions, and other safety related incidents including the great possibility of hijackings and terrorism require that the industry be highly regulated to ensure the safety of the flying and non-flying public. In addition, regulations ensure consistent, adequate, proficient training, skills, procedures and policies not just locally, but worldwide. The fees sting because the airlines lied to the flying public. And now a few companies have taken the charging of fees to a level of ridiculousness. And that is why congress is now considering increasing regulations. When the cats away the mice will play. If the airlines insist on being irresponsible and greedy then they only have themselves to blame for increased government intervention.
Nobody here thinks regulation for airlines isn't important. We all believe that you need regulation in order to ensure safe skies. I take issue to the government telling an industry how to run itself. The government has never told any other industry what they can charge and how they can operate. Its like telling baseball stadiums how much they can charge for beer. Thats astronomically high, but people still pay it and it would be totally inappropriate for the government to step in and regulate it. I hate checked bag fees too, they really do suck. But regulation like this is totally wrong.
I also think you may be somewhat shortsighted as well. For one thing, the airline fees normally feed directly into airport operations, renovations and investments. Airline investments have been at an all time high, coincidently when profits are high as well. It is fairly safe to say that in the current political climate, this new bill would never pass, and Representative Mica is up for re-election soon. Wouldn't it be great for him to campaign on introducing a bill that would lower airline fees? What voter wouldn't love that. Even if it is totally unrealistic, it is merely a campaign tactic. Tons of politicians do this.
I also think you may be somewhat shortsighted as well. For one thing, the airline fees normally feed directly into airport operations, renovations and investments. Airline investments have been at an all time high, coincidently when profits are high as well. It is fairly safe to say that in the current political climate, this new bill would never pass, and Representative Mica is up for re-election soon. Wouldn't it be great for him to campaign on introducing a bill that would lower airline fees? What voter wouldn't love that. Even if it is totally unrealistic, it is merely a campaign tactic. Tons of politicians do this.
$4.50 to turn them in. $45.50 when you want them back.
As much as I hate checked bag fees, regulating an industry in this way is counterproductive and un-American. I can't think of another industry that is told what to charge and how to charge it in the way Representative Mica is proposing. Airlines use any profit they make in investing in newer fleets, supporting American jobs and investing in airports. Their economic success is crucial to the global tourism business, and hindering their profits will have widespread effects around the world. This is a great campaign tool, one that will get a lot of support from many Americans, but once they think of the ripple effects something like this has I'm sure people will rather have a system much like the one we have today.