Todos
← Back to Squawk list
UA182 (B789 N25982), en route from Denver to Frankfurt Monday, reached 800 mph/695 KQ ground speed over Minnesota
Twitter post by W. Kentucky TV meteorologist, Noah Bergren (@NbergWX). Many eastbound flights shave-off considerable time now thanks to current jet stream speeds near 200 mph at FL34. For westbound flights the opposite is true, adding more twists to already jumbled timetables. For examples of other recently affected flights, see this story (paywall rules permitting) by DC meteorologist, Matthew Cappucci: https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/12/29/jet-stream-flights-december. Alternate… (twitter.com) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
No problem. I’d have done the same. I don’t want to be anywhere near MN in the Winter!!! ð¬
No matter how strong the tailwind is it has absolutely no effect on the Mach number that the aircraft is cruising at, just as a strong headwind cannot cause the aircraft's wing to stall. (i.e. to reach it's stalling angle of attack or AOA). A tailwind will ONLY increase the groundspeed and a headwind will reduce the groundspeed.
Exactly. Some of the commenters on Twitter don't comprehend the distinction.
[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]
Best not to get into that, madame/sir.
Suggest that applies to all schools with spoilt kids having little appetite to learn/earn.
[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]
[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]
Consider these points:
1) This is a thread about aviation not about public schools, why the distraction?
BTW the public schools where I live are really good with tremendous academics.
2) CRT is not being taught in any school (unless perhaps if the students are taking an AP class, which again is college level work and would therefore be totally appropriate). This is a malicious fantasy that CRT is being taught in schools is just a way of getting people all stirred up based on a lie and is highly divisive.
3) Given the utter right wing drivel being posted about CRT it would seem that it would be a good thing that CRT was taught in school.
1) This is a thread about aviation not about public schools, why the distraction?
BTW the public schools where I live are really good with tremendous academics.
2) CRT is not being taught in any school (unless perhaps if the students are taking an AP class, which again is college level work and would therefore be totally appropriate). This is a malicious fantasy that CRT is being taught in schools is just a way of getting people all stirred up based on a lie and is highly divisive.
3) Given the utter right wing drivel being posted about CRT it would seem that it would be a good thing that CRT was taught in school.
1. Because it eventually trickles down.
2. Yes it is.
3. Makes absolutely no sense. Speak English?
2. Yes it is.
3. Makes absolutely no sense. Speak English?
Name with address the school that is teaching CRT as a mandatory part of the children’s education.
You are aware that the premise of CRT and the copywritten materials are not exclusive, right? Fool. My god, thank god I live in a well-armed community (oh, and not Chicago - any longer)