Todos
← Back to Squawk list
Airport bans toy soldier's three-inch rifle from plane
... because it's a safety threat (www.dailymail.co.uk) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Safety threat. . . How is that a safety threat?
Good question.. for the same reason they banned Megatron from airplanes now, I guess..
This is funny lmao
This is sad, actually.
??????????????????????????????????????? 3inch rifle ??????????????????????????????????????????
WOW!! & I always thought that the U.S.’s TSA folks were rather SLOW in the brain department for using COMMON SENSE.
Sometimes you really have to ask yourself “ How did we manage to elect NON THINKING PEOPLE TO PUBLIC OFFICE” or WHO’S REAR DID THEY KISS TO GET THIS JOB?
Sometimes you really have to ask yourself “ How did we manage to elect NON THINKING PEOPLE TO PUBLIC OFFICE” or WHO’S REAR DID THEY KISS TO GET THIS JOB?
It is disapointing, even frightening, that so many Americans have come to accept this "HOMELAND SECURITY /TSA" monster.
I would like someone to explain to me why no-one has thought of the obvious - WHY IN HELL are we taxpayers funding a private business's security ?
I cant imagine having the sheer gall to ask the taxpayer to pay my costs of operating my aircraft, securing my airstrip or other aviation-related facilities.
The solution is simple. This monstrosity should be de-fund and de-certified, with the private airlines then establishing methods for their security. For too long the taxpayer has funded the airlines, who gleefully go bankrupt every few years, "stiffing" their creditors, so that some people can get airplane rides without paying the full cost of operating their seat.
ENOUGH already. Someone wants an airplane ride ? In a capitalist economy, let em pay for the service they want. Or we can "go socialist" and make it a public service? Shouldn't be my problem as a taxpayer.
is the
I would like someone to explain to me why no-one has thought of the obvious - WHY IN HELL are we taxpayers funding a private business's security ?
I cant imagine having the sheer gall to ask the taxpayer to pay my costs of operating my aircraft, securing my airstrip or other aviation-related facilities.
The solution is simple. This monstrosity should be de-fund and de-certified, with the private airlines then establishing methods for their security. For too long the taxpayer has funded the airlines, who gleefully go bankrupt every few years, "stiffing" their creditors, so that some people can get airplane rides without paying the full cost of operating their seat.
ENOUGH already. Someone wants an airplane ride ? In a capitalist economy, let em pay for the service they want. Or we can "go socialist" and make it a public service? Shouldn't be my problem as a taxpayer.
is the