Back to Squawk list
  • 70

Qantas Pilots Saved Crippled Airbus, Investigator Says

Enviado
 
The plane's pilots didn't realize the extent of the damage, however, until a passenger (himself an airline pilot) showed one of them a picture of the damage—captured by a camera on the plane's tail—that had popped up on the onboard entertainment system. (www.nytimes.com) Más...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


jzimmerman71
jzimmerman71 0
My fear early on in the A380 (or 3XX) project was "what happens to public sentiment when the first plane goes down taking its ~500 pax with it?". It appears this flight was only minutes from becoming that dreadful flight. I wonder if the airlines would start dumping the A380 had this flight turned into a trajedy? Glad we can only speculate.
toolguy105
toolguy105 0
This incident/accident is reminiscent of the DC10. One would have thought that incident would have told Airbus to install features that would not allow for the entire hydraulic system to be drained by one severed line as was the case with the United DC10. It won't take a fatal incident to cause the airlines to back away from this aircraft. Given the fragile economy of Europe, rising fuel prices and the possible downward trend in travel all it will take is one or more incidents such as this one to give the airlines pause to back away. Then of course the flying public refusal to book on these flights can be another factor as it was with the DC10.

If this was to happen Airbus could be down and out. As it is they are almost 2550 sales short of the break even point with this plane. They may not be in a financial position to withstand a production furlough or halt on this plane.
toolguy105
toolguy105 0
make that 250 not 2550 planes. Sorry for the typo
honzanl
honza nl 0
@ toolguy105 : no, better take a 787 which is overheating/on fire during flight...or take a 777/787 with ETOPS of more than 3 hours...if you would think (if...) you would know that the basic problem here was the engine, not the plane...
jzimmerman71
jzimmerman71 0
The general public only recognizes the airplane...not the engine. So what actually causes the incident/accident becomes completely irrelevant. Because of this reality, the problem truly belongs to Airbus.
Pileits
Pileits 0
Great job by the Pilots who saved nearly 500 lives and MILLIONS of dollars in lawsuits. For those who think pilots aren't worth the wages they get paid, think again!
airblitz
Elvin Zhou 0
I agree with Pileits...
jwt1958
Jim Thompson 0
Honza .. The A380 is an Aircraft, all of it.. Failure of the Trent 900 and the inadequate design of the containment is hauntingly similar to the failure of the GE CF6-6D in the United DC10 that went down over suoix city. In both cases the true threat to the aircraft was not the catastrophic loss of the engine, which in both cases was survivable but the loss of containment integrity which compromised vital flight systems. Point being, the A380's containment is inadequate. One would think that effective use of hydraulic fuses would be commonplace now ... look for some rethinking of the 380's systems just as McDonnell-Douglas did with the DC-10 and MD-11. Once again, as was the case with United 232, it was the cool mind of the man with his hands on the yoke (stick, whatever) that made the difference here.
nctrooper10722001
Thomas Moore 0
Im saying, "stay on the ground and we wouldnt have these problems" Can I Get one ??

Entrar

¿No tienes cuenta? ¡Regístrate ahora (gratis) para acceder a prestaciones personalizadas, alertas de vuelos y mucho más!
¿Sabías que el rastreo de vuelos de FlightAware se sostiene gracias a los anuncios?
Puedes ayudarnos a que FlightAware siga siendo gratuito permitiendo que aparezcan los anuncios de FlightAware.com. Trabajamos arduamente para que nuestros anuncios sean discretos y de interés para el rubro a fin de crear una experiencia positiva. Es rápido y fácil whitelist ads en FlightAware o por favor considera acceder a nuestras cuentas premium.
Descartar