Todos
← Back to Squawk list
White House Calls Potential Loss Of Aviation Jobs A 'Difficult Choice'
The President's press secretary said Wednesday that the potential loss of middle-class manufacturing jobs in places like Wichita where bizjets are built is a "difficult choice" that has to be made to preserve jobs for teachers or the national defense. (www.aero-news.net) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
If the current administration's policies will admittedly come at the cost of yet more GA industry job losses, doesn't that say something about the policies?
There is no painless way to cut spending. They need to start with the federal govt jobs to set the tone for the states. Their is nowhere that is bloated more than the Feds. I won't even start on entitlements!
We need revenue in addition to cuts. Both parties are at fault for getting us in this mess. I wish we could get a strong third party to end this plutocratic nightmare.
Only additional revenue they should have is through a better economy. They are proven poor stewards of taxpayer money. Spending CUTS, CUTS, and more CUTS. No tax rate hikes. IRS tax code overhaul a necessity. Feel the pain! It's the morning after the spending party hangover.
Agreed. History proves that tax revenues remain in a fairly narrow range of GDP (as a percentage) regardless of tax policy progressivist, so the key to higher revenues is economic growth. So why the push for higher and higher tax RATES? Politics. Sheer politics. Pit one group against another, politicians win, we all lose.
And the cuts scheduled in 7 days are so minuscule they are a joke but they are spreading fear about about the cutting of services and that national security is at stake. What a bunch of liars.
"And the cuts are so miniscule...." Are you fucking retarded? I mean seriously! Yes, it means we have less funding for aviation, which is the WHOLE FUCKING POINT OF FLIGHT AWARE!!! ESPECIALLY when the sequester was a republican ideal, only to use it against POTUS when today came. Ungodly people like you are why this country is shit. You protect the rich (against Christ's teachings) while admonishing the poor. Did Christ protect the rich? Nope, so you fucktards that downvoted me while thinking you represent Christ (protecting that in which Christ HATED) need to re-read the Bible. You can respond all you want, but you're still wrong, and evil.
Don't think Christ hated anybody. Don't think he cares if you are rich or poor as defined by money. Don't think he cares if you watch Fox.
"History Proves....." What history? If you mean REAL history then you'd see that American prosperity after The Great Depression was greated due to taxing the rich (the people that CAUSED the depression) as much as 90 fucking percent!! It created the infastructure as we know it today, as well as the MOST prosperous times of America's history!! Right now, we are asking that BILLIONAIRES pay a measly 39%, where as people like you and me pay MORE! How the FUCK do you defend the rich when YOU pay MORE than they do? We need REVENUE in ADDITION to cuts, like wasteful military spending. Cutting programs that actually HELP people (austerity) is what Europe has done, and as a uniquivical fact, FUCKED SHIT UP! You people are so far up FOX's ass you don't know what reality is.
What's next? Eliminating business use of autos as a deduction (business miles)? Or eliminating overnight stay as a business deduction? Those fat-cats also deserve to loose those bloated deductions. (I understand most people who use hotels/motels in the course of making a living are middle class) Where will it end?
Again, here is a person, the leader of a major country of the world, who is completely out of touch with the normal lives of those he governs.
Well what is good for the goose, should be good for the gander. Eliminate AF 1 and Michelle's air taxi. See how they like flying commercial!