Todos
← Back to Squawk list
First look at the Airbus A350 XWB. What's all the fuss about?
Images, the specs and the troubled history of Airbus' super lightweight plane. Can it take on Boeing and importantly, what does it mean for travelers? (travel.cnn.com) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
I see a maintenance nightmare...
Lol! CNN hails the 787 as revolutionary, but then when A350 comes along 'what's all the fuss about?' Biased much?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/25/travel/dreamliner-features/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/25/travel/dreamliner-features/index.html
A350 struggles to compete with both 777 and 787
It may work for Airbus or may not, we will see, it's just too early to say.
It may work for Airbus or may not, we will see, it's just too early to say.
While I'm not an Airbus fan, it's a sweet lookin' Airplane.
There could be bias but I see an analyzed response. Why make another giant jetliner, that is bigger than than the 787 and 777, and make it compete with them? Airlines these days are having enough trouble filling seats, so why make a jet with more to fill? I feel it would be more economic making a long range fuel efficient small load aircraft.
Enough trouble filling seats? I haven't been on a flight that wasn't at least 95% full in over 10 years.
that is called capitalism, if you prefer a single supplier move to China, Cuba or North-Korea
The big difference is in the mix of materials. The 787 (contrary to the article) has a larger percentage of composite materials that are spun in place into complete sections called "barrels." This means there is a huge decrease in the amount of individual parts and the associated fasteners. The A350, by contrast, has sections that are built-up in a more traditional style utilizing composites, titanium and LiAl alloys. Look closely at photos of the two aircraft and you will notice the absolute lack of fasteners on the 787 skin. Compare that to the photo of the A350 nose section. I have stood next to a 787 and it looks like a giant model airplane, smooth and sleek. Time will tell which one is "better" I think the market has plenty of room for both.