Todos
← Back to Squawk list
White House Calls Potential Loss Of Aviation Jobs A 'Difficult Choice'
The President's press secretary said Wednesday that the potential loss of middle-class manufacturing jobs in places like Wichita where bizjets are built is a "difficult choice" that has to be made to preserve jobs for teachers or the national defense. (www.aero-news.net) Más...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
It's a shame that some people have to resort to foul language in order to communicate with others. I kind of expect it in some places, but I hardly thought this was such a venue.
[This poster has been suspended.]
Go SPAM somewhere else
That's pretty crass. And when we loose the market to foreign builders of craft, explain to me the long term of that kind of decision? For example, I am willing to bet that the payroll of all those workers across the country would be a lot more than any perceived tax breaks owners of aircraft get.
What's next? Eliminating business use of autos as a deduction (business miles)? Or eliminating overnight stay as a business deduction? Those fat-cats also deserve to loose those bloated deductions. (I understand most people who use hotels/motels in the course of making a living are middle class) Where will it end?
Again, here is a person, the leader of a major country of the world, who is completely out of touch with the normal lives of those he governs.
Well what is good for the goose, should be good for the gander. Eliminate AF 1 and Michelle's air taxi. See how they like flying commercial!
What's next? Eliminating business use of autos as a deduction (business miles)? Or eliminating overnight stay as a business deduction? Those fat-cats also deserve to loose those bloated deductions. (I understand most people who use hotels/motels in the course of making a living are middle class) Where will it end?
Again, here is a person, the leader of a major country of the world, who is completely out of touch with the normal lives of those he governs.
Well what is good for the goose, should be good for the gander. Eliminate AF 1 and Michelle's air taxi. See how they like flying commercial!
If the current administration's policies will admittedly come at the cost of yet more GA industry job losses, doesn't that say something about the policies?
There is no painless way to cut spending. They need to start with the federal govt jobs to set the tone for the states. Their is nowhere that is bloated more than the Feds. I won't even start on entitlements!
We need revenue in addition to cuts. Both parties are at fault for getting us in this mess. I wish we could get a strong third party to end this plutocratic nightmare.
Why exactly do we need more revenue? Give me a reason for a revenue need and I will show you ten areas for a cut that would happen in the normal world without batting an eye. The concept of living within your means is foreign, isn't it? No more revenue increases just decrease the bloating and run it like a business which is what it is.
Your response just shows how ignorant you are when it comes to the economy. I will be downvoted mercilesly for truth. FACTS are that repubs are the ones that have destoyed our economy. Back in the summer of 2011, repubs REFUSED to create revenue, as a result our credit rating was lowered. Repubs only care about fucking over the poor and midddle class for their own ungodly agenda. Here is Business 101. When people have more money to spend, the more the economy thrives. You idiots want austerity, which Europe has proved doesn't work. They are fucked. I have $100 that says you don"t even know what that means. Here is economics 101. The more money the average citizen has to spend, the more money goes into the economy. You fucking morons FAIL basic econommics. Downvote me all you want, but as long as you fucking idiots get your "facts" from Nazi style propaganda, the more wrong you are. We've tried loweing taxes on the rich back in 1982 with Reagan. Here we are today and YOUR policies failed us. We have RECORD corperate profits, yet record low unemployment. Again, I have facts, you morons have propaganda. Joseph Goerbels would be proud of you. YOU are why this country is shit.
I'll take your hundred bucks and report it as gambling income, at that time we will have the revenue increase you so desire. Then after that is spent you can make foolish bets with others, who prefer a professional discourse as opposed to your maniacal rantings and thus an increase in revenue. You have solved the puzzle!
Where do you propose the average citizen get more money to spend?
I haven't seen anyone on here say they want austerity. They just want the gov to spend only what they take in, cut the waste, and not raise tax rates. We had a little war over taxes once. I do not have a problem with changing some tax code that favors a specific entity (special interest). We already have a graduated tax system that takes more from people who earn more.
You want more jobs and more money for the government? Then put an import tax on products coming into this country that are in excess of what that importing country spends with us ( trade deficit). That would drive many of those jobs back here.
If your idea is "giving" average citizen more money to spend that was taken from another citizen, that is socialism.
I haven't seen anyone on here say they want austerity. They just want the gov to spend only what they take in, cut the waste, and not raise tax rates. We had a little war over taxes once. I do not have a problem with changing some tax code that favors a specific entity (special interest). We already have a graduated tax system that takes more from people who earn more.
You want more jobs and more money for the government? Then put an import tax on products coming into this country that are in excess of what that importing country spends with us ( trade deficit). That would drive many of those jobs back here.
If your idea is "giving" average citizen more money to spend that was taken from another citizen, that is socialism.