Back to Squawk list
  • 35

Boom Supersonic CEO Wants Airport Screening Abolished

Submitted
In response to the USDOT Secretary Sean Duffy's question about making travel easier, Boom Supersonic Founder and CEO Blake Scholl said that TSA screening should be done away with completely. (www.gatechecked.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


musocat
I'd love to live in a world where screening wasn't needed. Oh! I have! I was alive and flying in the '70s. And guess what the '70s were the Golden Age of Skyjackings. I don't think a fortnight went by without one in the news. So there's screening now, and since 2001, lots of it.

The best way I've found to greatly reduce airport stress is get there really early. I skip all the email and morning news reading and arrive at least two hours before domestic flights and three hours before international flights. Then I'm in no rush to check my bag and get through security. Clear helps too (compliments of my American Express card). Then I find an empty gate (or a lounge, depending on my ticket), relax, and check my email and maybe even read an actual paper. Essentially, I swap the time I'd spend doing mundane stuff at home for a nice time buffer at the airport where I can do the mundane stuff.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 2
Arriving early is something I also do. Plus whenever possible book a flight that leaves between 8 in the evening and 5 in the morning. Less crowds, shorter line ups and security is less stressed.
EMK69
EMK69 43
I'm not sure it should be done away with, but this past January, I had to finally fly commercial. First time in over 20 years not flying myself. I found TSA very rude. In one case, the young TSA agent demanded I say good morning before she would answer my question. Unsure which line to stand in, the ticket agent was kind enough to explain the procedure. While he was describing, the other agent said, "Where are you from? Are you an idiot for not knowing what the procedures are?" I explained that I was a pilot and flew my own plane, and we didn't have TSA at my airport. He actually called me a liar, saying, "All airports have TSA agents."

I feel bad for the traveling public.
SmittySmithsonite
Sounds like you were in a Northeastern airport. That's par for the course up here. Everyone is perpetually miserable!
EMK69
EMK69 3
Reagan out of DC
btweston
btweston 3
I’m pretty happy. I live in a place where important things happen, and there’s a lot of interesting things to do.

I’m sure people are nice in Omaha, but If somebody dropped a nuclear bomb on the place nobody would notice for two days.
leroyk
Leroy Kelley 9
I have not traveled in a while but when did Ticket Agents start manning the TSA checkpoint ?
EMK69
EMK69 2
As I stated, the Ticket agent was kind enough to explain the procedures....the "other" agent, meaning TSA agent, was the rude one.
linbb
linbb 14
Thats the sad part from what I have seen the few times I have been flying some dont look the part. A few seem to show there is more I am in charge attitude rather than being customer orented.
ThinkingGuy
George Lane 2
I don't know if it's still the case, but at one point the TSA actually did have a posted motto of "Dominate. Intimidate. Control."

https://reason.com/2004/02/01/dominate-intimidate-control-2/
sefortenberry
Seems these TSA agents let their perceived power and control go to their heads. They are aware we aren't gonna take the time to report them.
oplowman
Owen Plowman 9
“But delete the TSA. Let us just walk onto airplanes like we do busses and trains. It will all be ok.”

Until it's not and somebody is blown out of the sky (again). What stupidity!
NeilPostlethwaiteItsAllBroken
Think he need to focus on delivering a plane you can board passengers on to. Worry about what will be VIP passengers later.

The easiest way to improve the experience is to avoid the Prioriry Boarding £$€ shakedown scam and board front and rear of the plane.

Any priority passengers should be last as they will be swanning it in the lounge anyway. As long as they have somewhere for their excesses of baggage it should not bother them a jot whilst they swan in on their own timetable/
Nibbles
Steve Pearce 11
Yes, this.

I would happily pay more for the airline to call me to the gate at the last possible moment so i get on the plane and the door closes behind me. Why would i want to get on first and sit on an already uncomfortable seat with no leg room and no IFE for half an hour whilst the rest of the SLF jostle around me.
laundryczar
laundryczar 5
I’m frequently a priority passenger and I’m the opposite. I want o board as soon as possible. I want my responsibility to board, settle and strap in over with. At that point, my work is done. I’ve traveled a lot and experience has taught me to play my part quickly and efficiently. Hanging out until the last minute, even with the airline’s blessing and encouragement sounds like asking for trouble.
That said, I may be crazy.
fmv96
Turkish Airlines does this (at least on domestic First Class. Had the privilege to fly on 3 separate legs on domestic First and how the operate is that you'll be in the lounge relaxing, then they will call you to board special (Lounge only customers) buses and the take you airside all the way to your airplane (if boarding by stairs) or to the base of the the jetbridge, you go upstairs and board last (almost shutting the door as soon as the last passenger boards. FAs have closed the respective First Class bins so no "advantageous passenger" can take up your space, so you basically enjoy about 20-30 more minutes of lounge time, avoid the boarding hassle and passengers parading down the aisle and get to board at the last possible second. Same on arrival, a bus waits only for First Class passengers and drives you all the way to the baggage claim area, so you avoid having to walk across the airport. This was back in January and February 2023. And as experiences go, they even had at the new Istanbul Airport a Business/First/Status curbside drop off, with exclusive checkin counters and dedicated security lane attached to the lounge so basically from curbside to lounge to airplane very smoothly without having to be in the airport.
vtrdave
dave i 5
I fly every month out of EWR. Not much of an issue going through TSA-Pre. Yeah, I’ve heard some workers shouting (talking loud) instructions because there are many people who fly once or twice a year and can’t remember what to do. I see it all the time, people not prepared. So talking loudly and repeating instructions is understandable but in a friendly way. No one should be belittled for making a slight error. I’m always friendly to them and they have been nice to me.

I still think we need screenings because people DO DUMB things and test the system. We don’t need them getting through. Got enough to deal with distracted walkers and people bringing on suitcases way too big for the overhead. LOL…
I fly home on monday night… Hopefully!!!
flyingleatherneck
JOHN BAUGH 12
I hate the current TSA process. It's meant to be intimidating and demeaning. Taking off shoes and walking on that nasty floor. Miles of walking to get to your gate which is painful and difficult for the disabled and impaired. Billions spent on this B.S. Colossal waste of time and money.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 2
I’m not a fan of it either but it’s for our safety so I tolerate it and I am always polite to the people working security. A smile and a Good Morning tends to reduce the rudeness I see them treated others with.
bt1104053
Bob Turner 8
I would be happy if we didn’t have to go thru TSA screening before flights but we have people in the world that are willing to die just to kill innocent people. Maybe the airlines should come up with their own security procedures and services to bypass TSA, then there could be some competition for best practices amongst them.
kenhash
Kenneth Hash 5
Airline security prior to TSA was their responsibility. The four hijackers on nine eleven changed that.
aurodoc
aurodoc 4
I am surprised with all the negative TSA comments. I fly out of the Bay Area, SLC and PHX often and have always had good interactions with TSA staff. I do have TSA precheck and global entry so I move though security pretty quick. I have been to Israel and man that is real screening!
I am fine with being screened as the consequences of missing something serious is pretty bad. Maybe AI will solve the problem like it is supposed to fix everything else in the world.
ddbguru
Ben Seidman 4
I am 74 years old with TSA pre-check and an artificial hip. Although sometimes, I can go through the metal detector without setting it off, I usually go through the X-Ray machine. TSA makes me take off my belt with a mostly plastic buckle. This is to avoid it being flagged on the machine. If they know the flag on the machine is my belt buckle, why make me take the belt off? It seems like a procedural thing because the TSA management does not trust the agent to read the screen.
Ricovandijk
Rico van Dijk 1
This is the nail on the head. These TSA workers are not allowed to think for them selves, so they blindly follow their procedures, that only work 80% of the time, namely when a picture perfect passenger comes along. But oh dear if you travel with kids, carry medical oxygen or simply misunderstand the procedure, you get a bollocking that would embarrass a 1960’s headteacher. Ot’s simply not OK. And they get away with it, because when you suggest it to change, (even in writing to their supervisors) you get the 9/11 speech (as if I wasn’t there). It’s not the point to make it less safe, only to make it less unpleasant. But I guess by the lack of intelligence and absent willingness to improve, this will be a difficult task, that can only succeed if all travellers stand together and collectively object to the current procedures.
KicksOnRouteA66
Roger Anderson 13
I travel multiple times a year and TSA is the part I always just can't stand. I'll be fair and say the encounters I've had were very cordial but it's always chaos and the bigger airports with the bins. Passengers getting shouted at because they don't know if to take the laptop out or not, or if they need to separate their shoes for non precheck lines.
bbabis
bbabis 9
In the last ten years I have flown on the airlines 3 times. Each time TSA was a serious hassle and only reinforces my desire to further cut down on the use of non private travel.
jeffinsydney
jeff slack 5
I only sit up front.
I have always worked hard to buy a better seat, but I have given up; I no longer want to travel.
Angry TSA, angry gate agents, angry cabin crew and worst of all, angry public.
LawrenceShaw
LawrenceShaw 6
Let’s not forget that whenever TSA hires a contractor to test them TSA misses the great majority of guns, knives, etc the testers seek to bring on board.
rwoollams
Yup. And even with lots of cops on the road, people still speed. But the issue isn't whether TSA is perfect. It's what would happen if there were no weapons screenings. As it is now, with everyone knowing that weapons are forbidden, TSA still finds something like 7000 weapons a year in normal screening. Usually they are people who "just forgot" that they carried a weapon.

Anyone who has ideas on how to improve the TSA in-airport experience should speak up. But is anyone seriously considering making commercial air travel weapons-friendly?
Ricovandijk
Rico van Dijk 2
First, anyone who forgot to take off their side arm was never going to do anything bad with it. But that aside. I had my (military in uniform) side arm with me and had to put it in the scanner. I asked if they found anything of interest? The agent didn’t understand my question, so I asked if they were scanning my gun to check if I hadn’t hidden a gun inside it? Then he shouted at me for making a joke and his job was too important to be distracted by jokes. I really pity these people. They get trained to be rude. And trained to follow their training without ever thinking for them selves. They are basically robots with poor programming.
briansfreeman
Brian Freeman 3
We all hate the screening, of course. But it is indisputable that there have been ZERO hijacked commercial aircraft in the U.S. since 9/11. Would we be able to say that had we not had the screening? I doubt it.
yarnoca1
John Yarno 3
I don't want screening abolished per se, just abolish TSA
rwoollams
OK. And replace it with what? Do you want hyper-skilled ninjas performing the screening? That would cost way, way more than we spend now. What if TSA just rebranded to "STA" or "AST"? Would that do it for you? Is this just a branding issue or do you have a substantive change in mind?
elgrifo
Ronn balloon 9
I think perhaps they employ people with low intelligence or low self esteem, people who have had terrible chidhoods, or been bullied at school.
These kind of bozos love to take out their defects on Pax.
The more vulnerable the target, the better !!
lear1000
lear1000 0
So these people chose to contribute to society by getting a job. I suppose you would also complain about them if they did not work at all and were standing on the street idle. How entitled of you. Be better.
Ricovandijk
Rico van Dijk 1
Lear1000 I on one hand totally agree with what you are saying, but I still find it hard to defend a work force that is deliberately rude, intimidating, bossy and angry all the time (the few rare exceptions have my compliments!). I seriously think some wouldn’t deserve a job in the leadmines.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 0
Here we are with everyone discussing how rude TSA agents are and you show us your sense of entitlement by acting like the very people Ronn was describing.
zuluzuluzulu
zuluzuluzulu 7
The TSA is fine. They are following the rules given to them. How aboutupdating the rules by letting those with real id’s get thru security with their shoes and belts on? what is the purpose of a real id if it cant weed out terrorists?
ColinSeftel
Colin Seftel 4
They do that. Enroll in TSA Precheck:
"https://www.tsa.gov/precheck"
leroyk
Leroy Kelley 5
Why not just hand out complimentary weapons to people when they checkin.
LawrenceShaw
LawrenceShaw 4
They already do! Fly First or Business on long haul flights and right away they hand you steel knives and forks!
ewrcap
ewrcap 2
And champagne glasses that easily convert into deadly weapons!
rwoollams
Yeah, but it's tough to put a hole in a jetliner with a steak knife or champagne glass.
LawrenceShaw
LawrenceShaw 4
True, but 9-11 was done with small, sharp items. Who wants to poke a hole in the fuselage?
rwoollams
They used those to gain access to the (unsecured) cockpits. That option no longer exists.

Does anyone really thinking allowing pax onboard with firearms is a good idea? Seriously?
Ricovandijk
Rico van Dijk 0
Sadly, a well trained bad guy can easily gain access to the cockpit only armed with a boarding pass. Luckily most haven’t found out how.
MSReed
MSReed 5
I haven't had to endure commercial air travel for years, but when I had that, er, pleasure, I was most annoyed by our having to remove shoes (especially a nuisance when I was wearing cowboy boots). One loon tried a totally impractical stunt and was stopped immediately, but an entire industry lost its mind. There are many important safeguards to be employed, but it would be nice if they made sense.
jg4760
John Gleason 4
A few years ago I was taking a late night flight from JFK to Bogota Colombia. During the screening both of my shoes went into the machine, but only one came out! I alerted the TSA agents about my missing shoe, but they just shrugged and continued screening other passengers.

I stood there not knowing how to proceed. Bogota El Dorado is a HUGE airport, it's a 15 or 20 minute walk to immigration, and I had no desire to walk that distance with one shoe!

Finally a TSA supervisor asked why I was standing there and I explained what had happened. A nearby passenger overheard and stated 'That must have been one nice m*****-******g shoe for someone to steal it!'

As it turns out, the shoe was stuck inside the machine, all ended well, and I got a much needed laugh in the process!
timjohns
Tim Johns 5
Airport security in the USA is an actively hostile and horrible process as a pax. Other countries have airport security, but my lived experience is that security in (most) other countries is not something that makes me dread going to the airport, or an overly burdensome process when at the airport. Everyone understands it's a thing, and we all get through it together and move on with our day. But I loathe flying in the USA purely because of TSA and the combative-first, semi-abusive experience. Avoid at all costs. So yes, anything this guy can do to make this better... will be better IMO.
zuluzuluzulu
zuluzuluzulu 8
Before 9-11, in both Schiphol and Heathrow, after clearing security, i was approached by security guards carrying assault rifles, accompanied by an english speaking agent and K-9s. They tersly asked everything from why I had three or four airline frquent flier bag tags to my many trips to Europe and South America to why I appeared nervous?

The answer to that was, I’m not used to being interogated by machine gun toting guards while a german shepard sniffed my ass.

Europe’s airport security isnt more pleasant.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 3
Try some third world countries where the guys with the guns don’t speak English. Not fun but if you keep calm and do your best to communicate respectfully they won’t shoot you.
Nooge
Nooge -6
I see the balloons in your ass held up
rwoollams
I have flown a ton in the US and rarely see or experience the sort of behavior you describe. I mainly see busy workers trying to keep the flow of passengers moving, and a handful of clueless/entitled people giving them crap. I suspect that those people would report a bad experience, but it would be of their own making.

In pondering the difference between the US and Europe on this Google tells us "TSA pay in the United States generally lags behind pay for similar security positions in other countries. TSA employees have historically been excluded from standard federal pay scales, leading to lower salaries and fewer benefits compared to other federal workers."

You want better screeners? Pay them.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 3
I havn’t flown a “ton” in the USA but I have flown there enough to agree with you. I have never personally been treated rudely by TSA in the USA but I have had some experiences in other countries that make me appreciate the better trained security in the first world.
lynx318
lynx318 2
It seems 24 years is long enough to forget 9/11
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 3
Personally I hope we never forget the mistakes that led to that.
creavis57
Keith Davis 4
He flies on a private jet, what does he care about the rest of us that fly commercial!
catalinagoose
Chris Bell 4
Unfortunately, I fly have to fly frequently and hate the whole "prison guard-inmate" relationship at the TSA screening. I wouldn't shed a tear if the TSA was disbanded. I don't believe they are particularly effective at their job, anyway.
captainfourbars
While there is a growing movement across the world who seek the destruction of all western Judeo-Christian, free democracies (especially the USA) and who worship death themselves and consider it holy martyrdom to kill non-believers in THEIR ways, it is not feasible to dispense with airport/airline security. Those days are gone for at least our lifetime.

But I do notice the huge difference in the nature, quality and attitude of security 'officials' in the USA to just about every other country I ever visit. The US needs to do as they did when immigration officers were hideous to incoming tourists and I believe it was Pres Clinton who made them behave like humans.

These US security personnel through are the worst of the worst. And their inability to use profiling is key to their weakness and wasted energy.

So, (1) Change the kind of people employed in the job and (2) introduce profiling and background checks as a one of the top priority mechanisms. It works well in other countries with high security standards. But we must not sacrifice the many for the Wokery of the few.
rwoollams
Could you elaborate on "the type of people employed in the job"?
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
The elimination of profiling is one of the biggest problems. And it’s not just airport security, if we know certain types of people are more prone to commit acts of violence then people who meet that criteria should be singled out for more scrutiny.
franciemr
1. Once I hit age 75, I no longer had to take off my shoes. Now when I started my trip 2 days earlier at age 74, I had to do so.
2. Real ID - I renewed my old not a Real ID driver's license online without having to provide any documentation. Just paid the fee. I now have a real ID license.
So, tell me again - how does taking off shoes or having a Real ID help? Maybe I'm missing something significant. Can't a computer savvy person with a good editing program pretty much copy and change most IDs and make the copy pretty believable to most?
kenhash
We now have to take off our shoes and belts because several years ago a would-be terrorist aboard an inflight commercial aircraft had an incendiary material hidden in his shoe and tried to ignite it! Terrorists are still seeking opportunities in which to kill Americans, therefore we must remain proactive and not become complacent otherwise the next commercial aircraft may be a target.
vtrdave
dave i 4
The new Real ID’s have a holographic image of your photo embedded into the card. as well as a secondary photo that has transparency around it so you can see through it. Both are extremely difficult to create and falsify. Hope that helps. But the fact that you didn’t have to go into the DMV to show more docs is interesting… maybe due to your age? or your state has better tech that can ID you without that MA Bell phone bill ;)
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
It may be extremely difficult but it is far from impossible. With the computer skills that many people have today there is no type of IS that is impossible to forge.
druck13
druck13 3
The reason behind this is case for supersonic aircraft is very much deminshed the if you have to spend many hours getting through security. A 4 hour flight sounds a lot better than 8 hours, but with 3 hours to navigate the airport before hand, 11 hours down to 7 doesn't sound nearly as much of a saving.
SteveCowell
Steve Cowell 3
Boom's passengers will be from the the wealthy and corporate ranks. Of course the CEOO wants to make his passengers experience as pleasant as possible. It's another way of dividing the have's from the rest of the travelers. As much as the TSA leaves a lot to be desired, they still afford a level of protection to the everyday traveler. Look at the numbers of weapons that were confiscated at checkpoints just in the last year from those alledgedly forgot the weapon was in their carry-on. All it takes is one attempt or one incident to set the entire industry backwards for years.
chroode
Chris Roode 3
Get rid of TSA.
Use the latest metal/bomb detecting walk through scanners.
Use the saved money to put two Air Marshals on every plane.
Or, hand out a two-shot derringer to each passenger before boarding, as a gift. (I'm joking)
LawrenceShaw
LawrenceShaw 2
Strong, sophisticated metal detectors, perfect! Taking away people’s eye drops, x-raying shoes, no water bottles, all that stuff is a waste.

I’ve had to go through the full TSA exam to get on a flight in a 8 seat prop plane with no cockpit. Any of us could have attacked the pilot without anything other than our hands!
a4mer49er
John Macaulay 2
Post-911 do you feel like the enhanced TSA screening procedures have saved any lives?
warmwynds
warmwynds 2
Abolish that program.
almacdonald18
Thank god I don't live there, however I used to visit once maybe twice a year and always enjoyed my visits. Now though I have absolutely no intentions of returning there. It's so much easier and more pleasant to travel to China and not so long ago I thought 'Never in a million years would you catch me even thinking that, let alone saying it.
brklein68
Bruce Klein 2
I'm a professional commercial pilot and normally fly my private plane out of a very small commuter serviced airport going short distances with less than 10 passengers. The TSA is a total waste of money, they have shown that their screenings at small airports are nill. It's a boondoggle of federal funding. The locals laugh about the TSA being, Thousands standing around!! And that is entirely accurate.
rwoollams
This is a terrible idea. We (I am speaking of the US here) live in a world where a significant portion of our citizenry is armed. In a no-screening world they'll be armed in the airport and on the flight. Combine that with the post-Covid loss of impulse control we have all seen and the usual frictions and annoyances of commercial air travel and how long before some Jethro starts waving his handgun around due to some real or imagined offense? How does that story end?

Add to that the foreign-inspired political threats. The people who, because of TSA and its kin have had to resort to ramming cars into crowds and shooting up grocery stores would now be able to get on a plane with their Glock. Does that really sound smart?

I get that TSA is a pain. Even with TSA Precheck its tedious. But the alternative is scary.
kenhash
Kenneth Hash 3
You have described our present world exactly! These same impatient complainers are the potential troublemakers onboard flights. Their ego does not rule my safety.
kenhash
Kenneth Hash 1
Anyone with common sense and an education would not suggest doing away with the TSA. Has he and everyone else already forgotten about 9/11/2001? Even if you feel YOU"RE in no danger to fly commercial without security screening, what about the innocent souls that are minding their own business in their daily lives on the ground? In case anyone has forgotten the horrid details of 9/11, the United States came under attack by terrorists' intent on destroying our Country and taking innocent lives. If some people feel they are so self-entitled that they shouldn't go through a security screening, then they don't need to fly. My safety is more important than your ego!
Ricovandijk
Rico van Dijk 1
I couldn’t agree more, it’s a major hinder for traveler's and crews alike, whilst it’s proven that it doesn’t prevent the bad guys to do harm if they choose to, because they just go around these security systems.
Best to spend all that money (and yet it costs billions worldwide) to prevent bad guys from getting out of their hiding spots, and straight into jail where they belong.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 0
For some of them jail isn’t the answer. We put down dogs that cannot control their impulse to bite people so why don’t we do the same with humans who cannot control their impulse to kill others.
RichGrantham
RichGrantham 1
“False Flag”. Consider the timing of his post about the TSA after Duffy has been tasked to resolve the outdated ATC problems. Maybe it’s a bit too much for him to handle and he needs a diversionary issue to divert the attention elsewhere?
kenhash
Kenneth Hash 1
I doubt that Boom Supersonic will ever build a supersonic commercial aircraft because it will be too expensive and the potential customers are few. The laws of physics still apply and when an aircraft breaks the sound barrier. air is compressed and a shock wave is created thereby causing the sonic boom. Just as with the Concorde, it will only be allowed on trans- Atlantic flights. His tiny airplane only has room for one test pilot.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
I think there will someday be affordable supersonic commercial flights. I just don’t think it will be in my lifetime.
jmilleratp
jmilleratp -3
If the oligarchs want it abolished, it will be abolished.
rmchambers
rmchambers 6
The oligarchs don't fly commercial.
jetfuel47
It's good to see this proposal put forth. The DHS and TSA resulted from the false flag events of 911, a false narrative. Not only violation of Fourth Amendment rights, the TSA system does not provide security at all. I hope legislators will look at the facts.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 5
How was 9 11 a false flag event?

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss