Back to Squawk list
  • 34

Ryanair Sues Disruptive Passenger For €3,000 Following Forced Diversion

Submitted
Ryanair continues its campaign to punish unruly passengers, filing another lawsuit against a disruptive passenger. (www.gatechecked.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


EMK69
EMK69 25
It's about time. Since the authorities won't or can't file criminal charges, I'm glad to see some action will be taken against them.
Itsis80
jim sisti 41
It is a start, but when will airlines begin sharing their blocked passenger list information with each other? If you are unfit to fly on airline "A", you should be unfit to fly on any airline.
Also, I wonder if airline passengers on a flight that gets diverted, delayed, or cancelled would have any legal standing to also file a small claims charge against the person who created the problem. That could be a bigger deterrent - imagine an international flight with 300 passengers all filing a claim against someone for disruptive behavior that resulted in a day of vacation lost;hotel and car rentals wasted, etc

marcusangelus
Mark Jenkins 6
What happens if a person is unfairly blocked from flying on airline "A"? If the lists are shared automatically, that would give airline "A" the power to prevent a person from flying on any airline.
RidgewoodNJ
Barry Morse 1
I asked a chat bot about sharing of blocked lists. It answered but could not site any sources. So the information may be completely untrue or erroneous:

"Yes, there have been instances where disruptive passengers have caused disturbances on one airline and then faced similar issues on another airline. Disruptive behavior can include anything from verbal altercations to physical confrontations, and such incidents can lead to legal actions, bans from airlines, or other consequences.

Airlines often share information about disruptive passengers to ensure safety and maintain order on flights. If a passenger is banned from one airline for disruptive behavior, they may be flagged on other airlines as well."
captainfourbars
captainfourbars 14
BAD! They should sue for the WHOLE cost, to the airline and full compensation and damages to every affected passenger. There can be no possible reason to do less. If they fail to do this perhaps passengers will start suing the airline. One class action will force the entire industry to act properly in cases like this. Culprits need to bear the cost of the consequences of their actions. And the courts need t ensure that the miscreant is not let off the hook until every penny is paid. Nothing else is justice.
btweston
btweston 1
Yeah I doubt that the average Ryanair passenger is going to be able to pay a bajillion dollars to make you feel better about yourself.
Jaime1949
Jaime Terrassa 5
good move Ryanair I hope learn something from it
sledogpilot
Duane Mader 9
They should be zip tied to a seat and gagged so that people can continue with their flight. Arrest them when the plane lands.
wcmertz
william mertz 4
Then they just pee on the seat and someone has to clean up the mess.
sparkie624
sparkie624 8
Land at closest suitable airport, Throw them out the door and continue the flight! They are on there own after that.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 6
Landing disrupts all the other passengers. Just drop in altitude until it’s safe to open the door and they are no longer a problem to anyone.
das5
Donald Stewart 5
Although that can't happen, I agree with you completely!
Bandrunner
Bandrunner 1
Probably refused to pay the extra charge for breathing Ryan's air.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

GraemeSmith
GraemeSmith 13
Well as I parse that punctuation taught to me by Mrs Mizen all those years ago...

That is a singular passenger owns the 'inexcusable behavior'.

If it were multiple passengers the apostrophe would be after the "s" - thus:

passengers'
1skate1
David Purtz -9
How were "them" offloaded and "they" were also banned if there was only a single passenger? Maybe you can run this by Mrs. Mizen.
RidgewoodNJ
Barry Morse 4
In addition to denoting the plural, "They" has been used for centuries in the singular when identity or gender of the subject was not determined. Every other statement points to the singular.
scottishwildcat
Calum Benson 2
Also, when legally required not to publish a defendant's identity until legal proceedings have found them guilty, not revealing their gender seems like a fairly sensible approach.
sasdrtx
Steve Smith -3
OK, I agree with that, but you must know that it's the common idiom now, since it's "offensive" to mention anyone's sex.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck -3
Careful. These days it is dangerous to question someone’s pronouns.

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss